All licentiate theses in veterinary medicine are assessed electronically in the E-thesis system.
Theses are examined by the coordinating supervisor and another (external) examiner. Together they submit a grade proposal, while the dean decides on the approval of theses according to a separate schedule.
Students must complete the thesis seminar before submitting their theses for examination. Detailed instructions for seminar work are available on the Instructions for Students website. For the seminar dates, see the seminar programme.
The schedule for the submission, examination and approval of theses is also available on the Instructions for Students website.
Students wishing to attend the graduation ceremony in June 2026 must submit their completed theses for assessment in E-thesis no later than on Tuesday, 7 April 2026. The schedule is binding, and the student cannot agree with the supervisor on a shorter review period.
A new assessment matrix and the new E-thesis introduced January 2025
The assessment matrix for theses is being redesigned. A single matrix has been drawn up for the medical fields at the University of Helsinki, approved by the Faculty Council in May 2024.
The new assessment matrix (link to PDF) and the redesigned E-thesis system have been deployed in the Degree Programme in Veterinary Medicine and all theses are assessed using the new assessment matrix.
Assessment of licentiate theses in veterinary medicine – detailed instructions
The thesis belonging to a licentiate degree in veterinary medicine is assessed by the coordinating supervisor and an external examiner appointed by the director of studies. The examiners submit a grade proposal to the dean, who decides on the approval and grade of the thesis.
The thesis can be a literature review or a systematic literature review or include original research in the form of an experimental section.
To facilitate the evaluation, the evaluation matrix is divided into three parts according to the type of thesis:
Thesis assessment is based on the areas of the assessment matrix (1–7), each assessed on a scale of 0 to 5. Area 7 (Work during the research process) is assessed only by the coordinating supervisor. For a literature review thesis, areas 3 (Research data and methods) and 4 (Presentation of thesis results) are not assessed.
The final grade of the thesis is the arithmetic mean of the area grades assigned by the examiners, where each area (1–7) has equal weight. Area 7, assessed only by the supervisor, must be multiplied by two so that its weight matches other areas. The grade is rounded to the nearest whole number.
The mean must be calculated with particular precision, and it is recommended that both examiners calculate it to verify its accuracy.
If both examiners assign the same area (1–6) a grade of 0, the thesis is rejected. If the grades assigned by the examiners for the areas of assessment differ by more than a single grade, the examiners may discuss the assessment.
In addition to the grade proposal, the examiners give the student written feedback, which must be based on criteria presented in the assessment matrix.
Both examiners must agree on the overall grade for the thesis, based on the arithmetic mean. If the examiners cannot reach a consensus on the grade, the programme director will appoint a third examiner for the thesis.
In case of disagreement, the grade for the thesis is determined as follows:
If two out of three examiners agree on the grade, it is assigned to the thesis. If all three examiners disagree on the grade, it is determined by rounding the mean of the examiners’ grades to the nearest whole number.